i hope G gets the numbers even thought you discarded one number already,
please dont give him any more numbers-
SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?
46 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?i hope G gets the numbers even thought you discarded one number already,
please dont give him any more numbers-
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?i just have one question for G
Arouet has 2 random numbers NP has 2 ¨special¨ numbers when you give the numbers.. will there be like for both? or will you reveal them for each individual
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?As it stands now, I gave MY numbers to Arouet and ProfWag via PM. It's MY numbers that are to be guessed as everyone knows, according to Arouet, that skeptics cheat
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Arouet is back on line here. Now the excitement builds.
Arouet has PM'd me with his numbers.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Sorry, I had a very important nap to attend to. PM sent with my two numbers.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Now what do we do? Should I stay here and wait for G.Adam to return?
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Then I shall take my numbers and go eat my dinner.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?that's not my claim, that was trying to pin down what Australia Skeptics accept as a claim.
It helps to understand a claim if you READ IT! None of you got to STEP 1! QUESTION & ANSWER PHASE STEP 1 The Tester writes down 10 yes or no questions that he has a genuine interest in finding out the answer to, not just an interest in whether I can give the answer for test purposes. The questions should cover different topics and use various formats, not all of the same type like whether something will happen in the future on all 10 questions. 48 hours later and none of you have thought of a yes/no question yet...
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Oh, that's too bad. Well, I'm not interested in participating in your question and answer one. Too uncertain, for reasons people have given. Especially if we don't know the answer. It would be based on interpretations that we could argue about forever. That's not a good way of showing psi. I don't know how you don't rule out just normal interpretation yourself.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Ninja, I'm afraid your two numbers are going to go to waste. Hopefully you have other uses for them. I'm going to save mine for the next time I play the lottery - I don't do it often, but at least they'll be used.
I hate to waste.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Fine, but the test is 100% objective, directly equivalent to a Zenner Card test.
In fact, all you have to do is use Question Cards instead of stars and wavy lines and I can read your card. But if you won't test out the subjective answers first because of your 'skeptical beliefs' that go against science and observation, then you hardly have the right aptitude to do a formal objective test. You refuse to get the channels working at all before a formal test! Like every skeptic out there! Unbelievable in the very essence of the term. LIke not testing a rocket engine on the ground, NAH ITS GOTTA GO TO THE MOON OR IT DIDNT WORK
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?Am I too late to play ? I guess 42 and Undecillion.
Re: SKEPTIC or PSEUDO-SKEPTIC?you like guessing numbers you are thinking of? but not guessing questions you are thinking of?
put some MEANING into your mind, THEN I'll read it!
46 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Return to PseudoSkeptic Fallacies Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|