Discuss General Topics.
25 Oct 2011, 03:31
Ok, do the spammers now have automatic post generating prorgams as well?
07 Feb 2012, 23:35
This is unsurprising. Abounding atheists (myself included) appear to atheism through analytical cerebration (I became an agnostic abounding abounding years afore I'd anytime heard of organised scepticism). Orthodox anaesthetic is based on the accurate method, which is the apotheosis of analytical thinking. I accept no botheration with another aesthetic - so continued as it can bear able accurate exploration.
11 Mar 2012, 09:27
I'm responding to the original poster here: He asks "What is it that draws 'conspiracy mongers' to 911?
This is a very stupid question with a very easy answer.
911 was a conspiracy. That's why. Even the "official" story is a conspiracy theory. People plotted and conspired together in secret to make these events happen. That is a conspiracy.
14 Mar 2012, 05:48
Yes, wag, that is the fact of the matter, 911 was a conspiracy. Do you, wag, actually think otherwise?
LOL I for one would LOVE to hear your theory on 911 that didn't involve a conspiracy.
In fact, I've never even heard anyone anywhere EVER say that 911 was not a conspiracy! Are you going to be the first, wag?
I can't even imagine what scenario wag could come up with where 911 was NOT a conspiracy....let's see...19 Saudis, Kuwaitis, etc. just by ACCIDENT happen to be boarding four airplanes in Boston very early one morning...LOL...then, sometime during those four flights, the group of arabs on EACH plane are suddenly stuck with the independent idea to fly their plane into important buildings in New York and Washington D.C.....why in fact, on TWO of those planes, they each decide to hit one of the Twin Towers of the world trade center! What a coincidence! What are the odds?!?
So please, wag, tell us all how 911 was not a conspiracy! I'm all ears...
14 Mar 2012, 08:41
AW is correct. Course he's just being a pedantic nit. But he's technically correct.
19 Mar 2012, 00:49
Troll-in-residence Arouet is correct when he says I am correct.
I didn't think anyone could argue with the fact that 911 was a conspiracy, no matter who you believe the conspirators to be.
Guess I over-estimated "professor" wag!
23 Mar 2012, 07:26
Arouet is a troll, albeit an exceptionally boring one.
Your post was poorly worded, I'm not sure if you were trying to accuse me of mocking paranormal research.
If that was your intent, you're pretty far off the mark, I'm deeply involved in certain fields of paranormal research.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.