Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
by ProfWag » 04 Feb 2014, 08:59
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=115_1269888455.jpg)
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by SydneyPSIder » 04 Feb 2014, 09:08
sorry, wag, nothing you are saying makes any sense now. you are just arguing rubbish for the sake of arguing.
give me evidence 'from Europe' that ordinary GSM phones can make contact with ground cell towers DIRECTLY from a plane that has not been fitted with the new phone relaying technology that has been out for the last few years (it came out many years after 9/11).
re your attempted random argument about signal strengths being higher in 2001, without tendering any evidence whatsoever, the trial of GSM digital phones was conducted by Dewdney in 2003, within 2 years of the 9/11 event, without much success, as noted -- at low altitudes and relative low speeds in a turboprop type plane with no metal shielding. flight attendants ever since the events of 9/11 have been objecting that it's impossible to make a GSM phone call from the air (except when the new relaying technology is fitted to a plane, of course), except when slowing right down for take-off or landing near an airport, when of course velocity is low to allow handshaking, and there are ample cell towers nearby and within range.
So, where's your European evidence, where's your 'higher signal strength' evidence, before we even entertain your silly fabricated objections for another second.
you are laughable, pseudo'prof'wag, you are laughable. Is anyone else getting sick of profwag's continual line of crap? I know I am. It's just going into the realm of time-wasting now, science was always the first casualty with this one.
-
SydneyPSIder
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24
by ProfWag » 04 Feb 2014, 09:32
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=115_1269888455.jpg)
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by ProfWag » 05 Feb 2014, 22:57
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=115_1269888455.jpg)
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by ProfWag » 06 Feb 2014, 19:05
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=115_1269888455.jpg)
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by SydneyPSIder » 08 Feb 2014, 11:17
FF's link to "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" is well worth linking to in its 5 hour entirety:
One general elected to continue the USAF exercises over Canada and Alaska while the US was clearly under attack. He was promoted later, rather than investigated, demoted or dismissed for what would appear to be massive incompetence.
Throughout the 5 hour documentary, as one watches the chief architects of the exercise talking in public, one can't help but notice all the subtle 'body language' cues whenever they are telling porkies or spinning -- their tone of voice changes to wheedling, and they frequently touch their faces or scratch their noses at those points etc -- almost unconscious attempts to 'hide their faces'. Even the most practiced lying psychopaths seem not to be able to control these telltales.
-
SydneyPSIder
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 18:24
Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
|
|