the details of the enormous amounts of
evidence relating to JFK's assassination.
I believe it might be a bit helpful
to simplify the task of sorting through
it, by eliminating certain aspects,
and focus on "key" elements.
____________________________________________
In order to bypass endless debates,
just "walk through" the evidence,
until you bump into a "wall beyond reason",...
although there are many such walls,
and for the sake of simplicity,and
to make my point easier to understand,
I'll stop at those "walls", that are just too
"high" for reason to scale over.
____________________________________________
-JFK was killed & JC was injured.
-one firearm/3 shots.
1-missed-shot.
1 head-shot.
1 multiple wounds-shot*
***************************************************************
WALL BEYOND REASON - CONDITION OF BULLET #399
***************************************************************
Commission Exhibit #399, the bullet found on the stretcher,
is virtually undamaged and had no blood or tissue on it.
Its appearance is consistent with having been fired through
the rifle into water or cotton, and not causing all of the
7 wounds in both JFK & JC.
bullets test fired into JUST ONE human cadaver bone distorts
the condition of the bullet to an extreme degree.
____________________________________________
If your definition of reason allows you to believe
that bullet #399 did create all that bodily damage
and still maintain its condition, without a trace of tissue
or blood,...
then you need not go any further wasting your time looking
into this matter, THE END.
____________________________________________
For everyone else, that's it.
you don't half to "dig deeper" seeking evidence
to justify your conclusion that the Warren Commission
is fundamentally flawed, especially since so much
emphasis was placed on the SINGLE BULLET THEORY.
As with everyone else in everyday life, the moment
someone is caught in a lie, (or if you'd like, NOT
TELLING THE TRUTH) their credibility is damaged,
and everything else that they say becomes JUSTIFIABLY,
"questionable", deserving of an extra layer of scrutiny.
or in this case, (at the very least) A NEW INVESTIGATION
____________________________________________
As an American,I'd prefer to live with a,
more truthful history, filled with corrected mistakes,
instead of a "perfect" one, filled with lies.Statistics: Posted by nobody — 23 Feb 2015, 12:16
]]>