Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking Christian Circular Arguments and Assumptions
Argument # 4:
The
Bible is a reliable historical document because it agrees with recorded
history
and archaeological evidence.
This is one of the
silliest
arguments based on sophomoric logic that even a juvenile could
detect.
Some apologists argue that because the Bible contains actual historical
places
such as the Red Sea, the ruins of the destroyed city of
This is simple to
refute. Just because something contains a fact does not mean
at all that
everything else in it is factually and historically true. For
example,
the Greek legends and myths describe a
Contrary to this
argument,
the Bible contains data which is inconsistent with recorded
history. For details, see the Smithonian
Statement on Bible Historicity.
For examples of
historical
errors in the book of Daniel, see Mistakes
of Daniel
(in fact, this article shows strong circumstantial evidence that the
author of
the book of Daniel deliberately deceived its readers about the year it
was
written, placing it 500 years before its actual date!)
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page